The Alec Baldwin Divorce Memoir and other links…
Alex Kuczynski: “Baldwin describes Basinger as having ‘the legal equivalent of Munchausen syndrome,’ appearing most alive ‘when she was surrounded by a battery of high-priced lawyers’; he suggests she did everything in her power to distort his relationship with his daughter. And woe to many of the lawyers, judges, anger-management therapists and shrinks mentioned in the book. They are variously ‘oily and smug,’ ‘pent-up, angry and even malicious,’ ‘cadaverous,’ ‘the Wicked Witch of the West Coast.’ One of Basinger’s attorneys is an ‘avaricious, inhumane garden slug.’ And that’s the nice part. Most lawyers strike him as ‘men and women who were not sufficiently smart enough to become doctors or engineers.’ Ouch. Let’s hope this guy doesn’t get divorced again.”
I commend Baldwin for going public this… too often the temptation in my anti-historical Black “community” is to assume (through media hypnosis) that these nasty-ass events don’t happen to so-called “white people.”
“Contraceptive Pill Influences Partner Choice”
ScienceDaily: “Humans choose partners through their body odour and tend to be attracted to those with a dissimilar genetic make-up to themselves, maintaining genetic diversity. Genes in the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC), which helps build the proteins involved in the body’s immune response, also play a prominent role in odour through interaction with skin bacteria. In this way these genes also help determine which individuals find us attractive.” Evidently, female contraceptive drugs have an effect on the subtle sense of smell human females use to detect (and be attracted to) males of genetic diversity.
“Infants Have Social Sightlines”
Bruce Bower: “Brief use of a trick, see-through blindfold led 18-month-olds to assume that a blindfolded adult could see objects in plain view, even though 18-month-old children rarely make such a mistake. …‘This first-of-its-kind training study shows how infants use themselves and their own experiences to understand the inner lives of others,’ Meltzoff says.” It is exciting to see Western science finally catching up to human powers that have been “folksy” for millennia. For me, personally, it is best to assume that children—starting with infants—can “read minds.” Now that you—with your Western ass—see the science behind this you will not be quick to assume that I am “crazy” by saying this.
It is simple: children need to know what you are feeling (and eventually why) for their very survival. Reading feelings is what people mistake for “reading minds”… These feelings occur in patterns—and children associate these patterns within other patterns and begin to draw conclusions. Here we can see that lofty “morality”—that adults must “set an example”—is not some pie-in-the-sky pulpit shit. Children need to be nurtured by upright and correct adults so they can develop accurate models of the universe. It is an abomination to live lies before the carefully watching eyes of children.