“Black worker gets $60k settlement for employer’s failure to give review and yearly increase” and other links…
theblackfactor.blogspot.com: “The EEOC charged in its lawsuit (Civil Action 08-2490, filed in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania), that Transteck failed to give a pay increase to Winston Jones, because he is African American. Jones, a Philadelphia resident with over 20 years of experience as a diesel technician, began working for Transteck in 2003 at its Levittown facility. The EEOC contended that despite Jones’ stellar job performance, the company failed to give him a salary increase or performance evaluation in 2006. However, the company provided salary increases to several white diesel technicians, including an increase to a white technician who had received numerous write-ups for poor performance, poor work quality or customer complaints. The EEOC charged that Jones, who was consistently ranked among the top technicians at the facility, received no salary increase in 2006 because of his race.”
This is a classic example of how the illusion of objective business intellect blinds so many self-described “average Americans” of all skin colors. There are so-called “business leaders” in my experience who are willing to spend literally millions of dollars trying to rid themselves of an emotional problem: fire one “stellar” employee and replace him with a half dozen “nice” (and mediocre) people.
“The True Cause of College-Tuition Inflation?”
Freakonomics Blog: “The growth in support staff included some jobs that did not exist 20 years ago, like environmental sustainability officers and a broad array of information technology workers. The support staff category includes many different jobs, like residential-life staff, admissions and recruitment officers, fund-raisers, loan counselors, and all the back-office staff positions responsible for complying with the new regulations and reporting requirements colleges face.”
“How much is watching TV costing you?”
37signals.com: “To put it into perspective, if you watch an average of 31.5 hours of TV each week (which the average person in the US does) and you value your time at minimum wage of $5.85 an hour, you are spending nearly $800 a month ($798.53) to watch TV. That comes to nearly $10,000 ($9582.30) a year. I would imagine that most people reading this value their time well above minimum wage, so the cost is likely several times that number. When you look at it from that perspective, watching TV is an extremely expensive and financial draining habit to have.”
Comments
tiffany, 2009-05-04 16:59:50
So if you get an average of 7 hours of sleep per night, you're losing that much too. What if you spend that time reading trashy fiction? Spending time with your family? Assumes that people want to and can work those extra 31.5 hours per week, and that it would be profitable. Makes no sense to me.
rasx(), 2009-05-05 16:54:25
What I think this 37Signals.com guy is saying is that time is money... Sleep prepares you to spend the next capitalist day working... A trashy novel or even television (proven to be very unlikely) might inform you---help you form a 'mental model' of the world to be more profitable going forward...
Nourishing thought systems is the priority here in rasx() context so that "time is money" might change into "What is time?"...